1/23/2024 0 Comments Samantha bee taylor greene trumps![]() In the federal case, Raffensperger is represented by Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, who is also a Republican. Raffensperger was infamously on the receiving end of a phone call where Trump pressured him to “find” enough votes to undo Joe Biden’s victory in Georgia. The GOP firebrand filed the suit against Republican Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, whose office oversees parts of the candidacy challenge process. He noted on Friday that no one has been charged with insurrection related to January 6, “despite all the resources of the Justice Department and FBI.” He also said removing Greene from the ballot would be akin to “stripping voters of their right to vote and upending democracy right before an election.” ![]() Greene hired the same lawyer, Bopp, who prevailed in the Cawthorn case. “I don’t think that the Amnesty Act likely was prospective,” Totenberg said, siding with the challengers, who said the 1872 law was retrospective and didn’t protect future insurrectionists.īryan Sells, attorney for the challengers, who are backed by the legal advocacy group Free Speech For People, piled on, saying, “The absurdity of his argument shines through like a beacon.” And on Friday, so did Totenberg, the Obama-appointed judge in Greene’s case. Some of the leading experts on the Constitution’s “disqualification clause” criticized that judge’s conclusion. A Trump-appointed federal judge shut down that challenge, ruling that a Civil War amnesty law passed in 1872 still applies and therefore shielded Cawthorn from being disqualified over his role in the January 6 insurrection.Ĭawthorn has denied any wrongdoing regarding January 6 and says he isn’t an insurrectionist. The anti-Greene challenge was brought by the same groups that unsuccessfully tried to remove Cawthorn from the GOP primary ballot in North Carolina. She previously told CNN that she had “never encouraged political violence and never will.” A spokesman said she wasn’t involved in planning any protests on January 6. Lawyers for Greene say she isn’t an insurrectionist and that disqualifying her would violate her First Amendment rights. They cited Greene’s own comments, including one video where she explicitly said she opposed the peaceful transfer of power to President Joe Biden “because he did not win this election.” The challengers claim that Greene can’t run for reelection because she “aided” the January 6 insurrection, allegedly planned with protest organizers and “encouraged” the violence that disrupted the Electoral College certification. The 14th Amendment of the US Constitution prohibits officeholders from returning to elected positions if they supported an insurrection. The hearing Friday was the latest chapter in the seemingly elusive efforts to hold prominent GOP officials responsible for January 6, which are playing out in a major congressional inquiry, a federal criminal probe that has largely focused on the rioters themselves and civil litigation. ![]() James Bopp Jr., a conservative lawyer who is representing Greene, said the challenge was “50 pages of newspaper articles, hearsay and political hyperbole.” He warned during the court hearing that if the challenge is allowed to proceed, it will embolden liberal groups to try to disqualify former President Donald Trump from running for reelection in 2024. ![]() That’s two days before a state judge is scheduled to hold a hearing on the underlying question of whether Greene engaged in or aided the January 6, 2021, insurrection and whether that disqualifies her from office. Totenberg said she will issue a ruling next week, likely on Monday. Greene then filed her own lawsuit in federal court, asking Totenberg to shut down the state-level proceedings. Madison Cawthorn, a North Carolina Republican.Ī group of Georgia voters, backed by a coalition of constitutional scholars and liberal activists, lodged the challenge against Greene last month with state election officials. Marjorie Taylor Greene, which claims she can’t run for reelection because she aided the January 6 insurrectionists.įederal Judge Amy Totenberg of the Northern District of Georgia said during a lengthy hearing that she has “significant questions and concerns” about a recent ruling in a similar case, which blocked the same challenge against Rep. ![]() A federal judge signaled Friday that she’ll likely allow a group of Georgia voters to move forward with their constitutional challenge against GOP Rep. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |